chemical weapon: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.86
, arsenal
Weight: 0.66
, explosive
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.59
, substance
Weight: 0.59
Siblings nuclear weapon
Weight: 0.80
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.79
, pepper spray
Weight: 0.72
, napalm
Weight: 0.68
, agent orange
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arsenal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arsenal, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(explosive, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(arsenal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pepper spray, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arsenal, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(explosive, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pepper spray, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pepper spray, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chemical weapon, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(arsenal, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pepper spray, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(explosive, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(arsenal, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chemical weapon, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)