chemicals: be in food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.56
, company
Weight: 0.56
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.48
, business
Weight: 0.48
, sector
Weight: 0.41
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.33
, oil company
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, software company
Weight: 0.32
, packaging
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in food 1.00
be used in food 0.94
be used on food 0.92
be in food bad 0.92
be added to food 0.89
be used in growing vegetables 0.76
be used by food manufacturers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(chemicals, be in food)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be used in food)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be used on food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(chemicals, be used on food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(chemicals, be used in food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be added to food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(chemicals, be added to food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be added to food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be used on food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(chemicals, be used in food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be in food bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(chemicals, be in food bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be in food bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chemicals, be used on food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be used in food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(chemicals, be added to food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(chemicals, be used in growing vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be used in growing vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be used in growing vegetables)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chemicals, be used in growing vegetables)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chemicals, be in food bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be used by food manufacturers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(chemicals, be used by food manufacturers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(chemicals, be used by food manufacturers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be used by food manufacturers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be in food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(chemicals, be in food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chemicals, be in food)