chemist: use special laboratory equipment

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents specialist
Weight: 0.60
, department store
Weight: 0.57
, professional
Weight: 0.56
, job
Weight: 0.55
, expert
Weight: 0.54
Siblings computer scientist
Weight: 0.35
, physicist
Weight: 0.35
, scientist
Weight: 0.34
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.33
, grocery store
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use special laboratory equipment 1.00
work in laboratory 0.87
be at lab 0.82
clean lab 0.81
be at chemistry lab 0.78
wear lab coat 0.76
use complex machine 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(professional, wear lab coat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(professional, wear lab coat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(professional, wear lab coat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(scientist, work in laboratory)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scientist, be at chemistry lab)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use complex machine)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(professional, wear lab coat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(scientist, work in laboratory)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(scientist, work in laboratory)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scientist, be at chemistry lab)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(scientist, be at chemistry lab)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(scientist, use complex machine)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(scientist, use complex machine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(chemist, clean lab)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chemist, be at chemistry lab)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(chemist, clean lab)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chemist, be at lab)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(chemist, be at chemistry lab)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chemist, be at lab)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chemist, be at lab)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chemist, clean lab)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chemist, be at chemistry lab)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(chemist, be at lab)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chemist, clean lab)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(chemist, be at chemistry lab)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(professional, wear lab coat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(scientist, work in laboratory)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(scientist, use complex machine)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(scientist, be at chemistry lab)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(chemist, use special laboratory equipment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(professional, wear lab coat)