chemistry: be as art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.65
, experience
Weight: 0.63
, science
Weight: 0.62
, knowledge
Weight: 0.60
, department
Weight: 0.60
Siblings organic chemistry
Weight: 0.37
, computer science
Weight: 0.35
, biology
Weight: 0.34
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.34
, mathematics
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as art 1.00
be considered as art 0.95
be related to art 0.92
be used in culinary arts 0.78
be related to culinary arts 0.77
be related to painting 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be related to art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mathematics, be related to art)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be related to art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(chemistry, be as art)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chemistry, be considered as art)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(chemistry, be considered as art)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chemistry, be related to art)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chemistry, be considered as art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chemistry, be related to art)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chemistry, be as art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chemistry, be as art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chemistry, be as art)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(mathematics, be related to art)