cheque: be in numerical order

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, negotiable instrument
Weight: 0.49
, instrument
Weight: 0.49
, letter
Weight: 0.49
Siblings line item
Weight: 0.28
, think
Weight: 0.27
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.27
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.27
, living thing
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in numerical order 1.00
be in order 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(letter, be in order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cheque, be in numerical order)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(letter, be in order)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in order)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(letter, be in order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cheque, be in numerical order)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(cheque, be in numerical order)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(cheque, be in order)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cheque, be in order)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cheque, be in order)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cheque, be in order)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cheque, be in numerical order)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cheque, be in numerical order)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(letter, be in order)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cheque, be in numerical order) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(letter, be in order)