chesapeake bay: be vulnerable to pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bay
Weight: 0.81
, estuary
Weight: 0.72
, site
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, lake
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lake tahoe
Weight: 0.35
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.35
, lake erie
Weight: 0.34
, lake superior
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vulnerable to pollution 1.00
is polluted 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(lake erie, is polluted)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lake champlain, is polluted)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lake champlain, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lake champlain, is polluted)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(lake erie, is polluted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lake erie, is polluted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, is polluted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chesapeake bay, is polluted)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chesapeake bay, is polluted)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chesapeake bay, is polluted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lake champlain, is polluted)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lake erie, is polluted)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chesapeake bay, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution)