chesapeake bay: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bay
Weight: 0.81
, estuary
Weight: 0.72
, site
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, lake
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lake tahoe
Weight: 0.35
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.35
, lake erie
Weight: 0.34
, lake superior
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is important resource 0.92
is natural resource 0.90
is important natural resource 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chesapeake bay, is natural resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, is important resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(chesapeake bay, is natural resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(chesapeake bay, is important resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, is important natural resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, is natural resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chesapeake bay, is natural resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(chesapeake bay, is important natural resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chesapeake bay, is important resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chesapeake bay, is important natural resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chesapeake bay, is important resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chesapeake bay, is important natural resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(chesapeake bay, has quality resource)