chess board: be at germany

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
, example
Weight: 0.45
, piece
Weight: 0.38
Siblings chess piece
Weight: 0.36
, chess set
Weight: 0.36
, table tennis
Weight: 0.34
, tennis game
Weight: 0.34
, chess player
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at germany 1.00
be at michigan 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at germany)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be at michigan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(chess board, be at germany)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(chess set, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(chess set, be at michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(chess board, be at germany)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(chess board, be at germany)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(chess board, be at germany)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chess board, be at germany)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at germany)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(chess board, be at germany)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chess board, be at germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at germany)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chess set, be at michigan)