chest: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.63
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, pain
Weight: 0.58
, heart
Weight: 0.58
, muscle
Weight: 0.57
Siblings chest pain
Weight: 0.39
, abdomen
Weight: 0.36
, neck
Weight: 0.35
, stomach
Weight: 0.35
, arm
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
is fat hard 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(neck, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(abdomen, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(arm, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(arm, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(arm, is hard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(abdomen, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(abdomen, is hard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(neck, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(neck, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chest, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chest, is fat hard)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(chest, is fat hard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chest, is fat hard)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chest, is fat hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chest, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chest, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(abdomen, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(neck, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chest, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(arm, is hard)