chicago: be famous for architecture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents los angeles
Weight: 0.67
, atlanta
Weight: 0.67
, illinois
Weight: 0.63
, hot spot
Weight: 0.62
, detroit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.36
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous for architecture 1.00
is famous 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(atlanta, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(illinois, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(detroit, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(detroit, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(illinois, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(atlanta, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is famous)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(atlanta, is famous)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is famous)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(miami, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(los angeles, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(atlanta, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(illinois, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(detroit, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(las vegas, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is famous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(seattle, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(seattle, is famous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ohio, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ohio, is famous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(miami, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(miami, is famous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(indiana, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(indiana, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(chicago, be famous for architecture)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chicago, is famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(chicago, is famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(chicago, is famous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(detroit, is famous)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(los angeles, is famous)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(illinois, is famous)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(atlanta, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(las vegas, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(miami, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(seattle, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(indiana, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(detroit, is famous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(los angeles, is famous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(illinois, is famous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chicago, be famous for architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(atlanta, is famous)