chicken: be at movie

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.65
Siblings salmon
Weight: 0.61
, broiler
Weight: 0.53
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.37
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, hamburger
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at movie 1.00
be at horror movie 0.88
be at scary movie 0.85
be used to scare movie goer 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(creature, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chicken, be at movie)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at horror movie)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chicken, be at movie)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(creature, be used to scare movie goer)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chicken, be at movie)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(creature, be at scary movie)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chicken, be at movie)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(creature, be at movie)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at horror movie)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(creature, be at scary movie)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(creature, be used to scare movie goer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at movie)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at horror movie)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at scary movie)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(creature, be used to scare movie goer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(creature, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at movie)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at horror movie)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at movie)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(creature, be at scary movie)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at movie)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(creature, be used to scare movie goer)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chicken, be at movie)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(chicken, be at movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(chicken, be at movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(creature, be at movie)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(creature, be at horror movie)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(creature, be at scary movie)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(creature, be used to scare movie goer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(creature, be at movie)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(creature, be at horror movie)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(creature, be at scary movie)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(chicken, be at movie)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(creature, be used to scare movie goer)