chicken: be attracted to red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attracted to red 1.00
has color red 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(meat, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chicken, be attracted to red)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(meat, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(meat, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chicken, be attracted to red)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chicken, be attracted to red)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chicken, has color red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chicken, has color red)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(chicken, has color red)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has color red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be attracted to red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chicken, be attracted to red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(meat, has color red)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(chicken, be attracted to red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(meat, has color red)