chicken: has physical part wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part wings 1.00
wings 0.90
even need wings 0.89
walk out with wings 0.84
has physical part legs 0.83
flap wings 0.79
has physical part fat 0.78
has physical part whiskers 0.78
has physical part quick 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chicken, has physical part wings)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meat, has physical part fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chicken, has physical part wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meat, has physical part fat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(meat, has physical part fat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, has physical part fat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meat, has physical part fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dark meat, has physical part fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(dark meat, has physical part fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(chicken, has physical part wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chicken, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(meat, has physical part fat)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dark meat, has physical part fat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(meat, has physical part fat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)