chihuahua: have considered canis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.69
, breed
Weight: 0.65
, small dog
Weight: 0.64
, cat
Weight: 0.62
, toy
Weight: 0.55
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, pug
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have considered canis 1.00
have considered same species 0.77
be considered dogs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(chihuahua, have considered canis)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chihuahua, have considered same species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chihuahua, be considered dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, be considered dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(chihuahua, be considered dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, be considered dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, have considered same species)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chihuahua, have considered same species)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, have considered same species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, have considered canis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(chihuahua, have considered canis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chihuahua, have considered canis)