child molester: is unable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents murderer
Weight: 0.69
, criminal
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, pedophile
Weight: 0.58
Siblings catholic priest
Weight: 0.66
, rapist
Weight: 0.34
, cougar
Weight: 0.34
, owl
Weight: 0.34
, drug addict
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unable 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(child molester, is unable)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(catholic priest, is unable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(child molester, is unable)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(catholic priest, is unable)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(catholic priest, is unable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(child molester, is unable)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(child molester, is unable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(child molester, is unable)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(child molester, is unable)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(child molester, is unable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(child molester, is unable)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(child molester, is unable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(child molester, is unable)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(catholic priest, is unable)