child: play chess

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents boy
Weight: 0.66
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, angel
Weight: 0.65
, toddler
Weight: 0.61
Siblings young person
Weight: 0.67
, boy scout
Weight: 0.67
, daughter
Weight: 0.65
, nurse
Weight: 0.65
, baby
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
play chess 1.00
play sport 0.77
be used to play game 0.77
wants to play fun game 0.77
play hockey 0.77
wants to play sport 0.77
wants to play sport to have fun 0.76
like to play game 0.76
wants to play dress-up 0.76
wants to play 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(boy, play hockey)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(child, play chess)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(girl, play sport)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(child, play chess)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(girl, wants to play)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(child, play chess)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(girl, wants to play)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(girl, play sport)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(boy, play hockey)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(boy, play hockey)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(girl, play sport)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(girl, wants to play)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(boy, play hockey)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(child, play chess)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(girl, play sport)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(child, play chess)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(girl, wants to play)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(child, play chess)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(child, play chess)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(child, wants to play)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(child, wants to play)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(child, wants to play)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(child, wants to play)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(child, play chess)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(child, play chess)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(girl, play sport)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(boy, play hockey)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(girl, wants to play)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(girl, play sport)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(boy, play hockey)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(child, play chess)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(girl, wants to play)