chile: be important to south america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.61
, economy
Weight: 0.60
, democracy
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.58
Siblings jamaica
Weight: 0.32
, argentina
Weight: 0.32
, uruguay
Weight: 0.32
, mexico
Weight: 0.32
, california
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to south america 1.00
be in south america 0.98
be important to america 0.94
be in america 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(state, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chile, be important to south america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(state, be in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(state, be in america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(state, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chile, be important to south america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chile, be important to south america)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(chile, be in south america)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chile, be in south america)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(chile, be in south america)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(chile, be in america)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chile, be in south america)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chile, be important to south america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chile, be important to south america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(state, be in america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chile, be important to south america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(state, be in america)