chile: have flag as texas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.61
, economy
Weight: 0.60
, democracy
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.58
Siblings jamaica
Weight: 0.32
, argentina
Weight: 0.32
, uruguay
Weight: 0.32
, mexico
Weight: 0.32
, california
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have flag as texas 1.00
have same flag as texas 0.99
have colours on flag 0.86
have same flag 0.84
have same colours on flag 0.84
has physical part flag 0.81
be in america 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(state, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chile, have flag as texas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(state, be in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(state, be in america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(state, be in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chile, have flag as texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(chile, have flag as texas)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(chile, have same flag as texas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(chile, have same flag as texas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(chile, have colours on flag)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(chile, have colours on flag)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(chile, have colours on flag)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chile, have flag as texas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(chile, have flag as texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(state, be in america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(chile, have flag as texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(state, be in america)