chimney: has quality effect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.64
, flue
Weight: 0.59
, wall
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, site
Weight: 0.55
Siblings silo
Weight: 0.34
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.33
, dome
Weight: 0.33
, fireplace
Weight: 0.33
, staircase
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality effect 1.00
effect environment 0.87
is quality 0.79
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chimney, has quality effect)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chimney, has quality effect)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chimney, has quality effect)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(flue, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chimney, has quality effect)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(flue, effect environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(site, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(flue, effect environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(site, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(staircase, has quality effect)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(staircase, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(silo, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(chimney, has quality effect)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(flue, effect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(chimney, has quality effect)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(chimney, has quality effect)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(site, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(chimney, has quality effect)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(staircase, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(staircase, has quality effect)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(silo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(silo, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(staircase, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(staircase, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(chimney, has quality effect)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chimney, has quality effect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(flue, effect environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(staircase, has quality effect)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(silo, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(staircase, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(flue, effect environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(site, is quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chimney, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)