chimney: was sweeping dangerous in times

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.64
, flue
Weight: 0.59
, wall
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, site
Weight: 0.55
Siblings silo
Weight: 0.34
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.33
, dome
Weight: 0.33
, fireplace
Weight: 0.33
, staircase
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was sweeping dangerous in times 1.00
was sweeping dangerous in victorian times 0.94
was sweeping banned 0.88
is dangerous 0.79
need swept 0.77
is swept 0.76
sweeps like winter time 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(silo, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(silo, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(silo, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in victorian times)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping banned)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(chimney, was sweeping banned)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in victorian times)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chimney, was sweeping banned)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(chimney, was sweeping banned)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in victorian times)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chimney, is swept)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chimney, need swept)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chimney, sweeps like winter time)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(chimney, sweeps like winter time)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in victorian times)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chimney, is swept)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chimney, need swept)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chimney, sweeps like winter time)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(chimney, is swept)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(chimney, sweeps like winter time)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chimney, is swept)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(chimney, need swept)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chimney, need swept)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chimney, was sweeping dangerous in times)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(silo, is dangerous)