chinchilla: have big ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big ears 1.00
get down ears 0.90
has physical part ears 0.89
have big eyes 0.88
has physical part eyes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(guinea pig, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, have big ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, have big ears)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(guinea pig, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chinchilla, have big ears)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has physical part ears)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part ears)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part ears)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chinchilla, have big eyes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have big eyes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, have big eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have big eyes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has physical part eyes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(chinchilla, has physical part eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, has physical part eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(guinea pig, have big ears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(guinea pig, have big ears)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(chinchilla, have big ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)