chinese food: has lot of vegetibles

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, food
Weight: 0.70
, meal
Weight: 0.61
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dim sum
Weight: 0.60
, noodle
Weight: 0.54
, pet food
Weight: 0.40
, mexican food
Weight: 0.39
, junk food
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has lot of vegetibles 1.00
cost lot 0.83
has lot of sugar 0.80
be at we do not understand 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has lot of sugar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, has lot of sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk food, has lot of sugar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, has lot of sugar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(chinese food, has lot of vegetibles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)