chinese food: is better day

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, food
Weight: 0.70
, meal
Weight: 0.61
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dim sum
Weight: 0.60
, noodle
Weight: 0.54
, pet food
Weight: 0.40
, mexican food
Weight: 0.39
, junk food
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is better day 1.00
be better after day 0.95
is better second day 0.91
is better next day 0.91
is day 0.88
is second day 0.80
is next day 0.80
is new year 's thing 0.77
is year 's thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(meal, is day)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chinese food, is better day)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(meal, is day)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(meal, is day)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(meal, is day)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is better day)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chinese food, is better day)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chinese food, be better after day)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(chinese food, be better after day)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chinese food, be better after day)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chinese food, is better second day)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chinese food, is better next day)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is better day)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chinese food, is better day)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(meal, is day)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(chinese food, is better day)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(meal, is day)