chinese food: is cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, food
Weight: 0.70
, meal
Weight: 0.61
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dim sum
Weight: 0.60
, noodle
Weight: 0.54
, pet food
Weight: 0.40
, mexican food
Weight: 0.39
, junk food
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheap 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chinese food, is cheap)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chinese food, is cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheap)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is cheap)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, is cheap)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(noodle, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fast food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(noodle, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(noodle, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(junk food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(junk food, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(mexican food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mexican food, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(chinese food, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chinese food, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheap)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(noodle, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(junk food, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mexican food, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheap)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(chinese food, is cheap)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)