chip: be considered junk food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered junk food 1.00
is junk food 0.98
is food 0.81
be called food 0.81
is unhealthy food 0.80
be called fast food 0.78
be considered unhealthy 0.77
be labeled as gluten free food 0.76
be labeled as gluten food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fast food, be called food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fast food, is food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fast food, be called fast food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chip, be considered junk food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food, is food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fast food, be called fast food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fast food, be called food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be called food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be called fast food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be labeled as gluten free food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fast food, be called food)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fast food, is food)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fast food, be called fast food)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(potato chip, be labeled as gluten free food)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be labeled as gluten free food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(chip, be considered junk food)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chip, is junk food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(chip, is junk food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chip, is junk food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chip, is junk food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chip, be considered junk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, is food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be called food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, be called fast food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered unhealthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(potato chip, be labeled as gluten free food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, is food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be called food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, be called fast food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(chip, be considered junk food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered unhealthy)