chip: be in foil bags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in foil bags 1.00
have half bags 0.83
has physical part bags 0.83
have full bags 0.82
have half full bags 0.79
taste better in smaller bags 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, have half bags)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, have full bags)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, has physical part bags)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, have half full bags)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(potato chip, have half bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato chip, have half bags)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(potato chip, have full bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(potato chip, have full bags)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(potato chip, have half full bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(potato chip, have half full bags)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(potato chip, has physical part bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(potato chip, has physical part bags)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(chip, be in foil bags)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(chip, taste better in smaller bags)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chip, taste better in smaller bags)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chip, taste better in smaller bags)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chip, taste better in smaller bags)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chip, be in foil bags)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(potato chip, have half bags)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(potato chip, have full bags)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(potato chip, has physical part bags)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chip, be in foil bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(potato chip, have half full bags)