chip: is unhealthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unhealthy 1.00
be considered unhealthy 0.95
is unhealthy food 0.95
be unhealthy for us 0.92
is inherently unhealthy 0.89
is unhealthy facts 0.86
is unhealthy essay 0.86
is unhealthy article 0.84
is harmful 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(fast food, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy facts)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, is inherently unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy article)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy essay)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, is inherently unhealthy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy essay)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy facts)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy article)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(fast food, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is inherently unhealthy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy essay)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy article)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy facts)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(fast food, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy food)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy facts)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, is inherently unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy essay)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy article)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(potato chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(potato chip, is unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(chip, is unhealthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(chip, is unhealthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food, is inherently unhealthy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy facts)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy essay)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy article)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fast food, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(potato chip, is unhealthy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered unhealthy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food, is inherently unhealthy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy facts)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy essay)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy article)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(chip, is unhealthy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fast food, is harmful)