chiropractic: has state care

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents modality
Weight: 0.64
, method
Weight: 0.60
, field
Weight: 0.59
, health
Weight: 0.57
Siblings acupuncture
Weight: 0.35
, medical doctor
Weight: 0.34
, reflexology
Weight: 0.34
, massage
Weight: 0.34
, ultrasound
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state care 1.00
is care reform 0.80
be good for health 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(health, has state care)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has state care)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(health, has state care)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(health, has state care)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(massage, be good for health)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(health, has state care)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has state care)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(massage, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(massage, be good for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(chiropractic, has state care)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has state care)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has state care)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(health, has state care)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(massage, be good for health)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(chiropractic, has state care)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(health, has state care)