chlamydia: be such threat to females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.54
, organism
Weight: 0.33
Siblings syphilis
Weight: 0.35
, gonorrhea
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.34
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such threat to females 1.00
affect females 0.83
be higher in females 0.80
affect males 0.79
be active in males 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, affect males)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(gonorrhea, affect males) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, affect males)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chlamydia, be such threat to females)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chlamydia, affect females)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(chlamydia, affect females)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, affect females)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(chlamydia, be higher in females)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chlamydia, affect males)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be such threat to females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chlamydia, be such threat to females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, be such threat to females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, affect males)