chlamydia: have reported

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.54
, organism
Weight: 0.33
Siblings syphilis
Weight: 0.35
, gonorrhea
Weight: 0.35
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.34
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have reported 1.00
is reported 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, have reported)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, is reported)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(gonorrhea, have reported)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, have reported)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(gonorrhea, is reported)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, is reported)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chlamydia, have reported)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, is reported)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chlamydia, is reported)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(chlamydia, is reported)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chlamydia, is reported)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, have reported)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chlamydia, have reported)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, is reported)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chlamydia, have reported)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, have reported)