chocolate: be good in food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.72
, dessert
Weight: 0.68
, indulgence
Weight: 0.66
, ice cream
Weight: 0.64
, snack
Weight: 0.64
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.74
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.67
, truffle
Weight: 0.54
, fudge
Weight: 0.47
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good in food 1.00
is food 0.92
is is food 0.91
make food 0.91
be considered food 0.87
be worst food eat 0.86
is is food of children 0.83
taste better then healthier foods 0.82
taste better healthier foods 0.81
taste then healthier foods 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chocolate, be good in food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chocolate, be good in food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chocolate, be good in food)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be worst food eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chocolate, be good in food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be worst food eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be worst food eat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better healthier foods)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste then healthier foods)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(truffle, be considered food)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(truffle, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be worst food eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be good in food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dessert, taste better then healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be good in food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dessert, taste better healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be good in food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(dessert, taste then healthier foods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be good in food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(truffle, is food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(truffle, is food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(truffle, be considered food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(truffle, be considered food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chocolate, be good in food)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chocolate, is food)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chocolate, make food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(chocolate, is food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(chocolate, is food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(chocolate, make food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(chocolate, make food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, is food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, make food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chocolate, be good in food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ice cream, be worst food eat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better healthier foods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(truffle, is food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(truffle, be considered food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ice cream, be worst food eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dessert, taste then healthier foods)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better then healthier foods)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(chocolate, be good in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dessert, taste better healthier foods)