chocolate: be used in candy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.72
, dessert
Weight: 0.68
, indulgence
Weight: 0.66
, ice cream
Weight: 0.64
, snack
Weight: 0.64
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.74
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.67
, truffle
Weight: 0.54
, fudge
Weight: 0.47
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in candy 1.00
is candy 0.97
is best candy 0.94
is popular valentine candy 0.88
is valentine candy 0.88
is most popular valentine candy 0.87
be called chocolate 0.81
be different to chocolate 0.80
be different to aztec chocolate 0.80
was called chocolate 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chocolate, be used in candy)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, is candy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chocolate, is candy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(chocolate, is candy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(chocolate, is candy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(chocolate, be called chocolate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be used in candy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chocolate, be used in candy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be used in candy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)