chocolate: has lot of fat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.72
, dessert
Weight: 0.68
, ice cream
Weight: 0.64
, snack
Weight: 0.64
, candy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.74
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.74
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.67
, truffle
Weight: 0.54
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
has lot of fat 1.00
be high in fat 0.89
has lot of sugar in it 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(candy, has lot of sugar in it)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chocolate, has lot of fat)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ice cream, be high in fat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chocolate, has lot of fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be high in fat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(candy, has lot of sugar in it)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(candy, has lot of sugar in it)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be high in fat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ice cream, be high in fat)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has lot of fat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(candy, has lot of sugar in it)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has lot of fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chocolate, has lot of fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has lot of fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chocolate, has lot of fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ice cream, be high in fat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(candy, has lot of sugar in it)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ice cream, be high in fat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(chocolate, has lot of fat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(candy, has lot of sugar in it)