chocolate: is yum

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.72
, dessert
Weight: 0.68
, indulgence
Weight: 0.66
, ice cream
Weight: 0.64
, snack
Weight: 0.64
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.74
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.67
, truffle
Weight: 0.54
, fudge
Weight: 0.47
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
is yum 1.00
is yummy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ice cream, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chocolate, is yum)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ice cream, is yummy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, is yummy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ice cream, is yummy)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chocolate, is yum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(chocolate, is yum)

Similarity expansion

0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, is yummy)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chocolate, is yummy)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chocolate, is yummy)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chocolate, is yummy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, is yum)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chocolate, is yum)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ice cream, is yummy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(chocolate, is yum)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ice cream, is yummy)