chopstick: stuck together at restaurants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.48
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
stuck together at restaurants 1.00
is stuck together 0.87
be sold stuck together 0.83
is stuck 0.79
be sold stuck 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chopstick, is stuck together)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(chopstick, is stuck together)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(chopstick, be sold stuck)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be sold stuck)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chopstick, is stuck)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be sold stuck)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(chopstick, is stuck)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chopstick, be sold stuck together)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chopstick, is stuck)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chopstick, be sold stuck)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, is stuck)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, be sold stuck together)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chopstick, be sold stuck together)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chopstick, is stuck together)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chopstick, be sold stuck together)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, is stuck together)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chopstick, stuck together at restaurants)