chopstick: were invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.48
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.35
, spoon
Weight: 0.35
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were invented 1.00
is invented 0.96
were invented in china 0.88
were invented in ancient china 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, is invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chopstick, were invented)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tool, were invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chopstick, were invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tool, were invented)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tool, is invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tool, is invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(tool, were invented)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chopstick, were invented)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tool, is invented)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(chopstick, were invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(chopstick, were invented)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(chopstick, is invented)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chopstick, is invented)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chopstick, is invented)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(chopstick, were invented in china)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chopstick, were invented in ancient china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(chopstick, were invented in china)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chopstick, were invented in china)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, were invented in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, is invented)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, were invented in ancient china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(chopstick, were invented in ancient china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chopstick, were invented in ancient china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chopstick, were invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tool, were invented)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tool, is invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tool, were invented)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chopstick, were invented)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tool, is invented)