chow: have reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.41
, restaurant
Weight: 0.39
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.35
, small dog
Weight: 0.34
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.34
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.34
, police dog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have reputation 1.00
have bad reputation 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chow, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chow, have reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chow, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chow, have bad reputation)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chow, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(chow, have bad reputation)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chow, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chow, have bad reputation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(chow, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chow, have bad reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chow, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chow, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chow, have reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chow, have reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chow, have reputation)