christianity: was appealing to people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cult
Weight: 0.66
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.66
, ideology
Weight: 0.65
, religion
Weight: 0.64
Siblings islam
Weight: 0.65
, atheism
Weight: 0.36
, christian
Weight: 0.36
, buddhism
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was appealing to people 1.00
was appealing to many romans 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(islam, was appealing to people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was appealing to people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(buddhism, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(buddhism, was appealing to people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(islam, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(islam, was appealing to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(christianity, was appealing to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was appealing to people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(christianity, was appealing to people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(buddhism, was appealing to people)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was appealing to people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(islam, was appealing to people)