christianity: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cult
Weight: 0.66
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.66
, ideology
Weight: 0.65
, religion
Weight: 0.64
Siblings islam
Weight: 0.65
, atheism
Weight: 0.36
, christian
Weight: 0.36
, buddhism
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was created 0.83
was established 0.81
was invented 0.81
was formed 0.79
was discovered 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was established)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was developed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(islam, was created)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was created)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(buddhism, was developed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(buddhism, was developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(buddhism, was created)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(buddhism, was created)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(islam, was created)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(islam, was created)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(buddhism, was formed)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(buddhism, was formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(buddhism, was established)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(buddhism, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(christianity, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(christianity, was formed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was established)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was invented)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(christianity, was created)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(christianity, was formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was discovered)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was formed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(christianity, was established)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(christianity, was formed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(christianity, was invented)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(christianity, was discovered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(christianity, was created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(christianity, was created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(christianity, was established)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(christianity, was invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(christianity, was established)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(christianity, was discovered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(christianity, was invented)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(christianity, was discovered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(christianity, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(buddhism, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(buddhism, was created)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(buddhism, was developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(islam, was created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was developed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(buddhism, was established)