churchyard: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.47
, stone
Weight: 0.39
, grave
Weight: 0.39
, cemetery
Weight: 0.38
, land
Weight: 0.38
Siblings westminster abbey
Weight: 0.32
, chapel
Weight: 0.31
, meadow
Weight: 0.31
, pub
Weight: 0.31
, graveyard
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at oklahoma 0.83
be at texas 0.80
be at england 0.78
be at maine 0.77
be at london 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(land, be at oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(churchyard, be at michigan)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(land, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(churchyard, be at michigan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(land, be at texas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(land, be at oklahoma)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(land, be at oklahoma)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(land, be at texas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pub, be at england)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pub, be at london)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(westminster abbey, be at london)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(land, be at oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(land, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(westminster abbey, be at london)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(westminster abbey, be at london)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pub, be at england)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pub, be at england)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pub, be at london)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pub, be at london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(churchyard, be at michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(churchyard, be at england)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at maine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(churchyard, be at maine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(churchyard, be at maine)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(churchyard, be at maine)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(churchyard, be at england)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at england)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(churchyard, be at england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(churchyard, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(land, be at oklahoma)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(land, be at texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pub, be at england)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(westminster abbey, be at london)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pub, be at london)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(land, be at oklahoma)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(churchyard, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(land, be at texas)