cicada: sing in waves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.47
, animal
Weight: 0.44
, bug
Weight: 0.42
, bird
Weight: 0.41
Siblings mosquito bite
Weight: 0.35
, ladybug
Weight: 0.35
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.35
, aphid
Weight: 0.35
, mosquito
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
sing in waves 1.00
sing 0.87
sing at night 0.84
make noise in waves 0.83
sing in unison 0.80
stop singing 0.79
singing at night 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bird, sing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cicada, sing in waves)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(bird, sing at night)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cicada, sing in waves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bird, sing at night)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bird, sing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, sing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bird, sing at night)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bird, sing)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cicada, sing in waves)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(bird, sing at night)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cicada, sing in waves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cicada, sing in waves)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cicada, make noise in waves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cicada, sing in unison)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cicada, sing in unison)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cicada, sing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cicada, sing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(cicada, sing in unison)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cicada, sing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cicada, sing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cicada, sing in unison)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cicada, make noise in waves)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cicada, make noise in waves)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cicada, make noise in waves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cicada, sing in waves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bird, sing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bird, sing at night)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bird, sing at night)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cicada, sing in waves)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bird, sing)