cigar: be expensive in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, object
Weight: 0.55
, smoke
Weight: 0.55
Siblings smoking cigarette
Weight: 0.34
, cigarette
Weight: 0.34
, cigarette lighter
Weight: 0.33
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in australia 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.90
be illegal in australia 0.90
be expensive in uk 0.88
be illegal in uk 0.77
is illegal uk 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cigarette, be expensive in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cigarette, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cigarette, be expensive in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cigar, be expensive in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cigar, be expensive in canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cigar, be expensive in canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cigar, be expensive in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cigar, be illegal in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cigar, be expensive in canada)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cigar, be expensive in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cigar, be expensive in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cigar, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cigarette, be expensive in australia)