cinema: have curtains on walls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents entertainment
Weight: 0.69
, art
Weight: 0.68
, television
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, language
Weight: 0.63
Siblings movie theater
Weight: 0.38
, theater
Weight: 0.36
, movie theatre
Weight: 0.36
, music
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have curtains on walls 1.00
have curtains 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(theater, have curtains on walls)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, have curtains)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(theater, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(theater, have curtains on walls)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(movie theater, have curtains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(movie theater, have curtains)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cinema, have curtains on walls)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cinema, have curtains)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cinema, have curtains)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(cinema, have curtains)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cinema, have curtains)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cinema, have curtains on walls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cinema, have curtains on walls)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(theater, have curtains on walls)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cinema, have curtains on walls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(movie theater, have curtains)