cinema: is cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents entertainment
Weight: 0.69
, art
Weight: 0.68
, television
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, language
Weight: 0.63
Siblings movie theater
Weight: 0.38
, theater
Weight: 0.36
, movie theatre
Weight: 0.36
, music
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cold 1.00
is unnecessarily cold 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(movie theatre, is cold)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(movie theater, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(movie theater, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(movie theater, is cold)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(movie theatre, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(movie theatre, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cinema, is cold)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cinema, is unnecessarily cold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cinema, is unnecessarily cold)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is unnecessarily cold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cinema, is unnecessarily cold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cinema, is cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(movie theatre, is cold)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(movie theater, is cold)