cinnamon: be good in coffee

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.74
, herb
Weight: 0.68
, ingredient
Weight: 0.67
, color
Weight: 0.65
, taste
Weight: 0.65
Siblings peppermint
Weight: 0.39
, cumin
Weight: 0.39
, caramel
Weight: 0.39
, garlic
Weight: 0.38
, thyme
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good in coffee 1.00
coagulate in coffee 0.78
be in drinks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(taste, be in drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cinnamon, be good in coffee)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(taste, be in drinks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in drinks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(taste, be in drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, be good in coffee)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(cinnamon, be good in coffee)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cinnamon, coagulate in coffee)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, coagulate in coffee)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cinnamon, coagulate in coffee)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, coagulate in coffee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, be good in coffee)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cinnamon, be good in coffee)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(taste, be in drinks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cinnamon, be good in coffee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(taste, be in drinks)