citizen: be expected vote

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents foreigner
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.60
, partner
Weight: 0.58
Siblings public servant
Weight: 0.63
, home owner
Weight: 0.60
, poor person
Weight: 0.57
, taxpayer
Weight: 0.57
, sportsman
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expected vote 1.00
be allowed vote 0.88
need vote 0.87
be vote 0.87
have vote 0.86
vote 0.86
get vote 0.86
be allowed vote during one day 0.84
fail vote 0.83
be vote for president 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(citizen, be expected vote)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(citizen, be allowed vote)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(citizen, vote)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(citizen, vote)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(citizen, vote)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(citizen, fail vote)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(citizen, be allowed vote)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(citizen, be allowed vote)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(citizen, fail vote)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(citizen, fail vote)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(citizen, fail vote)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be allowed vote)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(citizen, vote)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be expected vote)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(citizen, be expected vote)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(citizen, be expected vote)