citizen: be involved with judicial branch

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents foreigner
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.60
, partner
Weight: 0.58
Siblings public servant
Weight: 0.63
, home owner
Weight: 0.60
, poor person
Weight: 0.57
, taxpayer
Weight: 0.57
, sportsman
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
be involved with judicial branch 1.00
be involved in judicial branch 1.00
be invloved with judicial branch 0.95
be involved with legislative branch 0.91
be involved in legislative branch 0.91
be involved with branch 0.90
be involved in branch 0.90
participate in legislative branch 0.87
be invovled in legislative branch 0.87
be involved in executive branch 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(citizen, be involved in judicial branch)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(citizen, be invloved with judicial branch)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(citizen, be involved with legislative branch)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(citizen, be involved in legislative branch)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(citizen, be involved in judicial branch)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(citizen, participate in legislative branch)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(citizen, be invovled in legislative branch)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(citizen, be involved in executive branch)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be involved in judicial branch)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(citizen, be involved in judicial branch)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(citizen, be invloved with judicial branch)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(citizen, be invloved with judicial branch)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(citizen, be involved in legislative branch)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be involved in legislative branch)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(citizen, be involved with legislative branch)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(citizen, participate in legislative branch)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be invovled in legislative branch)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(citizen, be involved in legislative branch)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(citizen, be invovled in legislative branch)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(citizen, participate in legislative branch)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(citizen, be involved with legislative branch)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(citizen, be involved in executive branch)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be invloved with judicial branch)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(citizen, participate in legislative branch)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be involved with legislative branch)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(citizen, be involved in executive branch)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(citizen, be invovled in legislative branch)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be involved in executive branch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(citizen, be involved with judicial branch)