citizen: be responsible for pay state tax

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents foreigner
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings public servant
Weight: 0.63
, home owner
Weight: 0.60
, poor person
Weight: 0.57
, taxpayer
Weight: 0.57
, adult
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be responsible for pay state tax 1.00
pay government 0.82
has right to determine tax 0.81
pay bill 0.80
pay their bill 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, pay bill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(customer, pay their bill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(customer, pay their bill)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(customer, pay bill)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(customer, pay their bill)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(customer, pay bill)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(taxpayer, pay government)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, pay bill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(customer, pay their bill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(taxpayer, pay government) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(taxpayer, pay government)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(citizen, has right to determine tax)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(citizen, has right to determine tax)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(citizen, has right to determine tax)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(citizen, has right to determine tax)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(customer, pay bill)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(customer, pay their bill)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taxpayer, pay government)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(customer, pay bill)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(citizen, be responsible for pay state tax) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(customer, pay their bill)