city: be comprise of neighborhood

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.72
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be comprise of neighborhood 1.00
be compose of many neighborhood 0.78
has many house and neighborhood 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(town, be compose of many neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(city, be comprise of neighborhood)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(town, be compose of many neighborhood)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(town, be compose of many neighborhood)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.17
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(town, be compose of many neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(city, be comprise of neighborhood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(city, be comprise of neighborhood)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(city, has many house and neighborhood)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(city, has many house and neighborhood)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(city, has many house and neighborhood)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(city, has many house and neighborhood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(city, be comprise of neighborhood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(city, be comprise of neighborhood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be compose of many neighborhood)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(city, be comprise of neighborhood)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be compose of many neighborhood)