city: be ugly and beautiful

Related concepts

Parents	town Weight: 0.73 , school district Weight: 0.72 , park Weight: 0.69 , sewer Weight: 0.68
Siblings	quebec city Weight: 0.83 , salt lake city Weight: 0.82 , new york city Weight: 0.72 , mexico city Weight: 0.71 , national park Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be ugly and beautiful	1.00
be beautiful	0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(city, be ugly and beautiful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(national park, be beautiful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(city, be ugly and beautiful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(national park, be beautiful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(national park, be beautiful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(city, be ugly and beautiful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(city, be ugly and beautiful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(city, be ugly and beautiful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(city, be ugly and beautiful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(city, be ugly and beautiful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(city, be ugly and beautiful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(city, be ugly and beautiful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(city, be ugly and beautiful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(national park, be beautiful)